A Preference for Bach: Modern vs. Period Instruments
As a simple listener rather than a music snob, I appreciate the variety in Bach recordings across modern and period instruments. The range of instruments, playing styles, and orchestrations adds unique flavors to the experience. While some purists stick to traditional methods, I believe there is room for both interpretations to coexist harmoniously.
Key Points: The variety of instruments and playing styles adds to the appeal. Period instruments enhance Bach’s emotional and dynamic nature in works like those of the Baroque era. Modern interpretations may lack the nuance and depth found in historically informed performances.The Variety of Bach Interpretations
Growing up, I used to be a fan of the traditional recordings with huge choirs and slow tempos. However, as my exposure to modern interpretations increased, I began to find the older versions a bit tedious unless I was in the specific right mood. Similarly, while I enjoy the richness of a large choir, I sometimes feel it drowns out the intricate instrumental parts.
Occasionally, even with the modern mix, the difference in the types of instruments can be subtle. I wonder if some people can differentiate, let alone appreciate, the subtlety of the materials used in these instruments. Imagine Bach hearing his music played inaccurately with traditional instruments. It’s likely he would see beauty in it but also might wish the playing was closer to his vision.
Period Instruments: A Preferred Choice
When it comes to period instruments, I am particularly drawn to them from Monteverdi to Mozart. For composers like Bach, Handel, Vivaldi, and Haydn, period instruments add a refreshing and emotionally powerful touch to their works. The balance and freshness that these instruments bring are unmatched.
Moreover, period instruments are better suited for works that emphasize gestures and phrases closely related to dance styles. This is often referred to as the "historically informed" style. However, I would love to see more variation in modern interpretations, with some slower and more deliberate performances that focus on the meaning of the piece.
Blending Modern and Traditional Styles
While both modern and period interpretations have their strengths and weaknesses, they both contribute to the richness of Bach’s music. I do not see why modern musicians should miss the joy of playing his works on period instruments. Conversely, period instruments improve the clarity and emotional depth of the performances.
However, after listening to numerous modern interpretations, I find that they often offer either "insanely fast," "very fast," or "fast" tempos, which can be monotonous. The desire for variety leads me to explore earlier performances from the 50s and 60s by conductors like Klemperer and Karajan, although they suffer from outdated recording quality. Going back even further, recordings of performances by Furtw?ngler are still tolerable but quite lacking in quality.
Listening with an Open Mind
It is important to recognize that not every 18th-century orchestra was brilliant. Most orchestras during that time were probably mediocre. Therefore, it is acceptable and even refreshing to listen to modern performances that may not be technically flawless. Today, there are smaller, less known orchestras like the baroque club in my town, who offer a delightful performance of Bach’s works, free from ego.
Ultimately, both modern and period styles have their place in the rich tapestry of Bach’s music. For me, period instruments add a special emotional quality to certain compositions, and modern interpretations offer a range of tempos and interpretations. The key is to embrace the variety and find the style that best resonates with your tastes.