Frank Zappa and Donald Trump: A Hypothetical Critique
It is likely that Frank Zappa would have had little to no respect for Donald Trump's presidency. As a man with a firm stance against authoritarianism and a keen distaste for the wealthy and powerful, Zappa's take on Trump would have been unequivocal.
Disagreement on Tax Policies and Philanthropy
Despite their mutual desire for tax cuts, it is clear that Zappa and Trump would have found little else in agreement. Zappa was passionate about a true flat tax system, whereas Trump's tax policies leaned more towards providing explicit favors to the wealthy. Zappa's anti-authoritarian views would likely have caused him to denounce Trump's presidency, much as he would criticize rich, authoritarian politicians in his music.
Anti-Authoritarianism vs. Libertarianism
Unlike many libertarians who may have accepted Trump's presidency due to the tax benefits, Zappa's anti-authoritarian stance would have made him quite disappointed. His approach to criticizing authority would have been derisive and serious, a tone that he adopted in his later interviews. Thus, it is highly unlikely that he would have supported Trump's policies, no matter the incentives.
Stages of Criticism
Zappa's criticism of Trump would have varied depending on the stage of life he was in. If he were a younger man, say in his 20s, Zappa would have likely written a piece much like "More Trouble Coming Every Day," a song that critiques the status quo and the manipulation of public opinion. If he were in his late 30s, his criticism would have been more abstract, akin to "Idiot Bastard Son," a track that can be interpreted as a harsh commentary on political figures who prioritize power over the public good.
If he were in his late 40s, Zappa's critique would have been more direct, with titles like "Dick's Such an Asshole" or "Jesus Thinks You're a Jerk." These titles, with some minor adjustments, would perfectly encapsulate the nature of Trump's presidency.
Frank Zappa: An Unlikely but Ideal President
It should not be forgotten that Zappa was not just a critic but also a man of action. If he had lived long enough to run for office, he would have made an excellent president. Using his well-documented work ethic as a guide, one could assume that Zappa would have delivered a remarkable administration. His presidency would have been marked by honesty, intelligence, and a commitment to public service. In fact, it is entirely possible that his image would have been etched alongside the other presidents on Mount Rushmore.
Some of Zappa's most formative political experiences included testimony before Congress in the PMRC hearings, and a feasibility study into running for presidency. He also had meaningful business dealings with Czechoslovakian President Vaclav Havel, further strengthening his ties to international leadership.
Furthermore, Zappa's actual run for presidency, which he seriously considered, was almost realized. He had chosen a running mate in H. Ross Perot and had plans for key assignments, including Alan Dershowitz for the State Department. Unfortunately, his plans were derailed by a battle with prostate cancer, which ultimately ended his life.
It is clear that if Zappa had lived long enough, he would have made an excellent president. America never got the chance to experience his leadership, and this is something we continue to regret to this day.