How to Identify Self-Taught versus Formally Trained Guitarists: Insights and Signs
The Debate: Self-Taught vs. Formally Trained
The age-old question of whether someone is self-taught or has received formal training on the guitar can often be a point of debate among musicians. However, telling the difference between the two can sometimes be tricky. Here, we explore various ways to discern whether a guitarist has learned through self-study or under the guidance of a professional instructor.
Unique Clues to Identify Self-Taught Guitarists
While there is no single definitive way to identify someone’s guitar background, there are several subtle clues that can provide valuable insights into their training path.
1. Unconventional Holding and Playing Styles
One of the most distinctive signs of a self-taught guitarist is a lack of proper holding and playing technique. For instance, if they hold the guitar in an unconventional manner or use an unorthodox fingering and picking technique, it might indicate that they largely learned by themselves. A professional instructor would typically correct such mistakes and guide the student towards more efficient and ergonomic techniques. An example is the unusual scenario where a person holds the guitar backwards, fingering with the right hand and picking with the left hand. While some may find this interesting, no ethical teacher would permit a student to develop such inefficient methods.
2. Limited or Outdated Musical Theory Knowledge
Formally trained guitarists rarely play without a solid understanding of music theory, including scales, chord progressions, and modes. Someone who claims a vast amount of self-study but demonstrates limited knowledge of these fundamental concepts might be a self-taught guitarist. Conversely, a formally trained player would generally have a comprehensive grasp of these basics.
3. Incomplete and Incongruent Skill Set
A selectively learned skill set can also indicate a self-teacher. For example, a guitarist who knows advanced jazz techniques like complex chord progressions and modes but is entirely ignorant of basic music theory may suggest they are self-taught. Conversely, a formally trained player would generally have a more balanced skill set, covering both advanced theoretical knowledge and basic techniques.
4. Limited Access or Exposure to Advanced Materials
Formally trained guitarists have access to a wealth of advanced materials, such as books, courses, and workshops. For instance, a guitarist who has studied from a 589-page advanced jazz book with countless chords, modes, and foreign scales, as well as techniques by famous guitarists like Joe Satriani, Eric Johnson, Yngwie Malmsteen, Paul Gilbert, and Steve Morse, is likely formally trained. Without such materials, a self-taught player may not have developed the same level of depth and breadth in their knowledge.
Understanding the Value of Both Approaches
It's important to recognize that there are pros and cons to both self-study and formal training. Self-taught players often develop unique styles and approaches that may not be as structured but are highly individualized. On the other hand, formally trained players benefit from a structured curriculum that provides a strong foundation in both theory and practice.
In conclusion, while it can be challenging to distinguish between a self-taught and a formally trained guitarist, paying attention to their playing style, knowledge, and access to advanced materials can provide valuable insights. Both paths can lead to mastery, and ultimately, what truly matters is the quality of the music and the joy it brings to listeners and performers alike.