Why So Many Bad Shows and Few Good Ones

The perception that there are many bad shows and few good ones can be attributed to several factors. This article explores these factors and discusses the challenges in distinguishing between content that meets high standards and that which falls short.

Content Overload and the Rise of Streaming

The sheer volume of content being produced today, especially with the rise of streaming services, has led to a wider range of quality. According to content analyst Jane Doe, networks and streaming platforms now produce more shows than ever before, with a larger percentage failing to resonate with audiences. This overload has created a de facto sorting process where only the most impactful and well-constructed shows survive.

Market Demand and Formulaic Content

Networks and streaming platforms prioritize shows that are likely to attract large audiences. This often results in content that is formulaic or derivative, lacking in innovation and craftsmanship. For instance, crime dramas like Law Order and police procedurals like Blue Bloods follow predictable plots and resolutions, which may meet viewer expectations but do not push the boundaries of storytelling. This focus on what is safe and proven can lead to a homogenization of quality, leaving fewer truly innovative and high-quality titles.

Diverse Tastes and Critical Reception

With a diverse array of viewers, what constitutes a "good show" can vary widely. Some shows that are panned by critics can still find a loyal audience, while critically acclaimed shows may struggle to connect with viewers. This disparity in critical and popular reception contributes to the perception that high-quality content is less common than it actually is within the vast landscape of television.

Risk Aversion in Production

Production companies often opt for safer bets when it comes to investment, especially when it comes to long-form content like series. Unique or experimental shows, while potentially groundbreaking, often carry a higher risk of failure. This aversion to risk can stifle creativity and lead to more mediocre offerings. Shows like Better Call Saul, Ozark, Chernobyl, Fortitude, and Succession stand as exceptions, produced with high budgets and meticulous attention to detail, while the majority of TV shows are cranked out on a tighter budget with less polish.

Short Attention Spans and Quick Consumption

As audiences have become accustomed to binge-watching and quick consumption of content, there is less patience for slower-paced or more complex narratives. Shows that cannot cater to these preferences may be dismissed or labeled as subpar. The demand for quick, easy entertainment is driving the production of less thought-provoking and less innovative shows. This trend is particularly noticeable in genres that rely heavily on plot-driven episodes and a reliance on familiar tropes to ensure audience satisfaction.

Conclusion

While there are certainly many shows that may not meet high standards of quality, the diversity and sheer volume of content available make it possible for viewers to find many hidden gems amidst the noise. However, the entertainment industry must continue to strive for better content that challenges and engages audiences, rather than relying on safe and predictable formulas.