Why Does the Rolling Stones Show No Love for Donald Trump?
Introduction
The relationship between Donald Trump and the Rolling Stones has been frosty at best. This article delves into the multifaceted reasons behind this lack of adoration from the iconic rock band. It explores the 1989 incident, the band's ethical stance, and the broader ethical implications of using their work without permission.
The 1989 Riot: A Tarnished Chapter
One significant event that strained the relationship between Donald Trump and the Rolling Stones occurred in 1989. During this time, Trump had promoted a Rolling Stones concert at his Atlantic City casino. This move did not sit well with Keith Richards, the band's guitarist, who has an intense hatred for Trump.
The reason for this hatred is twofold. First, Trump broke the law by using the band's music without obtaining permission or making payment. This action demonstrates a blatant disregard for intellectual property rights and the laws governing the use of copyrighted material.
Decades of Misbehavior
However, the issue goes beyond mere legal transgressions. Keith Richards feels that Trump's decades of morally reprehensible behavior towards others have further deepened the divide. The Rolling Stones, like any other band, have high standards when it comes to whom they align themselves with, and Trump's treatment of people has made him an unwelcome figure in their eyes.
Using Music Without Permission
One of the most contentious issues lies in Trump's persistent use of the Rolling Stones' music at his rallies. Despite being formally notified through cease and desist letters, Trump continues to use the band's music without authorization. This behavior is not only illegal but also shows a complete disregard for the band's rights and the principles they stand for.
The Rolling Stones' Response
The Rolling Stones have every right to take legal action against Trump. They could sue for damages and ensure that their music is used only with their permission. The band's deep pockets and financial stability would likely withstand Trump's typical tactics of attempting to bankrupt their legal adversaries. Trump's "My lawyers will bankrupt you so I don't have to obey any laws" approach is ineffective when dealing with well-financed entities.
Conclusion
The lack of love between Donald Trump and the Rolling Stones stems from a combination of legal transgressions, ethical considerations, and the band's high moral standards. Trump's actions have damaged this relationship beyond repair. The Rolling Stones, a band known for their integrity and respect for the law, will not be easily swayed by the controversial figure that is Donald Trump.
Understanding this dynamic is crucial for anyone interested in the intersection of entertainment, politics, and intellectual property rights. The case of the Rolling Stones and Donald Trump serves as a reminder of the importance of respecting the rights of creators and the consequences of disregarding those rights.